MissAdventures of Another Kind...

Random sense, in an unorthodox manner...


Can you tell this is complete gibberish?

Creating the Circus of Dreams…

Circus Field

Alright this may be madness, foolishness, and even a fruitless endeavor, but my inspiration will not let me be. I am constantly dreaming of the Night Circus, a novel by Erin Morgenstern, and the temptation to create a floating circus ‘Party” will not rest.

SO inspired by book clubs and release parties, I am going to attempt to start a small version of my own, a party that will mysteriously appear and disappear from my friends back yards over the next few months, complete with tarot readings, carnival games, illusions and glorious food.

I picture trees covered in crystal “ice” with with roses “growing” at their base. I dream of the illusionist Georges Melaise performing his magic tricks and drawing us into realms of fantasy as he plays upon the back of a house or wall. I envision glowing clouds, mirrored scapes, patrons attending a free event dressed in black in white; a few sporting the occasional burst of Red. I see games of chance, darts and rings, collections of mysterious bottles and  trees of fire. I smell popcorn and caramel, taste the froth of root beer and ice cream, the tang of lemon, the sweet of sugar and ice, and hear the sounds of the carnival; haunting me each night and seducing me each morning. This can only end one of two ways…badly or with a new tradition and new reveurs born; as the party appears with new and different exhibits, entertainments and amusements in a new location each time, with other as hungry for it ‘s re-emergence as I.

 And if a few more of my friends or acquaintances should read the book, that wouldn’t hurt either…

otlgaming:

WHO LOOKS AFTER SLEEPING ANGELS?

This hauntingly beautiful sculpture by Clare Gladding is so realistic it puts shivers down my spine. Now if only she had these for sale! Check out her website for some more intricately realistic sculptures.

You may also like:
Realistic Mario Sculptures

Beautiful

(Source: vimeo.com)

So Cute!

(via outintheeyre)

Click for HQ. 

(Source: lucyfabray, via communitythings)

10 Terrifying Doors You Really Don’t Want to Open

From geekosystem.comcute…

1 year ago
ragbag:

on eating elephant
what does elephant taste like? some intrepid individual over at the awl searches through every single book on the google books website and gets an answer for you. 

As anyone educated by “The Flintstones” knows, one of prehistoric man’s favorite meals was barbecued mastodon ribs. Paleolithic cave paintings seem to support the claim (though whether the ribs were prepared with a dry rub or marinade is still a hot topic in archaeological journals). In fact, evidence suggests that early hunters found their way to the new world in the first place by chasing mammoth herds as they fanned across continents. So how did the cow, an ugly-looking milk monster from Vermont, become the utilitarian protein of the masses while the elephant, the mammoth’s lumbering grand-nephew, is only ever eaten in animal cracker form? The long answer involves section headings like animal lifespan, infrastructure, social taboos, endangered species lists and insurmountable husbandry challenges.
The short answer, however, is simple: the elephant has the strength of a hundred Danny Trejos. Add in its trunk and a set of thrashing tusks, and it’s best not to mess with one. But back in the day, certain adventurous individuals did eat elephant flesh and live to tell the tale for our vicarious benefit. Here are their wild accounts. READ MORE

__
special thanks to aaron cohen for his help in gathering information.

ragbag:

on eating elephant

what does elephant taste like? some intrepid individual over at the awl searches through every single book on the google books website and gets an answer for you. 

As anyone educated by “The Flintstones” knows, one of prehistoric man’s favorite meals was barbecued mastodon ribs. Paleolithic cave paintings seem to support the claim (though whether the ribs were prepared with a dry rub or marinade is still a hot topic in archaeological journals). In fact, evidence suggests that early hunters found their way to the new world in the first place by chasing mammoth herds as they fanned across continents. So how did the cow, an ugly-looking milk monster from Vermont, become the utilitarian protein of the masses while the elephant, the mammoth’s lumbering grand-nephew, is only ever eaten in animal cracker form? The long answer involves section headings like animal lifespan, infrastructure, social taboos, endangered species lists and insurmountable husbandry challenges.

The short answer, however, is simple: the elephant has the strength of a hundred Danny Trejos. Add in its trunk and a set of thrashing tusks, and it’s best not to mess with one. But back in the day, certain adventurous individuals did eat elephant flesh and live to tell the tale for our vicarious benefit. Here are their wild accounts. READ MORE

__

special thanks to aaron cohen for his help in gathering information.

(Source: ragbag)

ragbag:

know your fools
one of the 14 reasons i was so heavily into the king’s speech last year was that it reintroduced modern audiences to the fool trope of mediæval literature. only after the monarch (george vi) listens to the seemingly non-sensical advice of his social inferior and then participates in his foolish exercises, is he able to become a tru-sovereign™.
i maintain that fools are all around us. but what’s the difference between the fool and the jester? is a buffoon or natural still a fool? it turns out that the taxonomy of fools is as complex as the taxonomy of lizards. here is francis douce’s early nineteenth century attempt to classify all the types of fools in just the works of shakespeare alone:

I. The general domestic fool, often, but as it should seem improperly, termed a clown. He was 1. A mere natural, or idiot; 2. Silly by nature, yet cunning and sarcastical; 3. Artificial. All these officiated occasionally as menial servants.
II. The clown, who was 1. A mere country booby; 2. A witty rustic; 3. Any servant of a shrewd and witty disposition, and who, like a similar character in our modern plays, was made to treat his master with great familiarity in order to produce stage effect.
III. The female fool, who was generally an idiot.
IV. The city or corporation fool, whose office was to assist at public entertainments and in pageants. To this class belong perhaps the Lord Mayor’s state fool, and those employed by the companies of trades, &c.
V. Tavern fools. These seem to have been retained to amuse the customers…They were sometimes qualified to sing after the Italian manners. Fools were also employed in the common brothels.
VI. The fool of the ancient theatrical mysteries and moralities. He was, more properly speaking, the Vice…Being generally dressed in a fool’s habit, he appears to have been gradually and undistinguishably blended with the domestic fool; yet he was certainly a buffoon of a different sort. He was always a bitter enemy to the Devil, and a part of his employment consisted in teazing and tormenting the poor fiend on every occasion. He ceased to be in fashion at the end of the sixteenth century.
VII. The fool in the old dumb shows exhibited at fairs and perhaps at inns, in which he was generally engaged in a struggle with Death…It is possible that some casual vestiges’ of this species of entertainment might have suggested the modern English pantomimes.
VIII. The fool in the Whitsun ales and Morris dance.
IX. The mountebank’s fool, or merry Andrew. 

were you to take the cosmo “what fool are you quiz” where would you land? as for me, i could see myself pretty easily as a class ii, subtype 1 fool. 
___
source: “a dissertation on the clowns and fools of shakespeare,” in illustrations of shakespeare, and of ancient manners, by francis douce (1807).

I really like this guys Tunmblr.

ragbag:

know your fools

one of the 14 reasons i was so heavily into the king’s speech last year was that it reintroduced modern audiences to the fool trope of mediæval literature. only after the monarch (george vi) listens to the seemingly non-sensical advice of his social inferior and then participates in his foolish exercises, is he able to become a tru-sovereign™.

i maintain that fools are all around us. but what’s the difference between the fool and the jester? is a buffoon or natural still a fool? it turns out that the taxonomy of fools is as complex as the taxonomy of lizards. here is francis douce’s early nineteenth century attempt to classify all the types of fools in just the works of shakespeare alone:

I. The general domestic fool, often, but as it should seem improperly, termed a clown. He was 1. A mere natural, or idiot; 2. Silly by nature, yet cunning and sarcastical; 3. Artificial. All these officiated occasionally as menial servants.

II. The clown, who was 1. A mere country booby; 2. A witty rustic; 3. Any servant of a shrewd and witty disposition, and who, like a similar character in our modern plays, was made to treat his master with great familiarity in order to produce stage effect.

III. The female fool, who was generally an idiot.

IV. The city or corporation fool, whose office was to assist at public entertainments and in pageants. To this class belong perhaps the Lord Mayor’s state fool, and those employed by the companies of trades, &c.

V. Tavern fools. These seem to have been retained to amuse the customers…They were sometimes qualified to sing after the Italian manners. Fools were also employed in the common brothels.

VI. The fool of the ancient theatrical mysteries and moralities. He was, more properly speaking, the Vice…Being generally dressed in a fool’s habit, he appears to have been gradually and undistinguishably blended with the domestic fool; yet he was certainly a buffoon of a different sort. He was always a bitter enemy to the Devil, and a part of his employment consisted in teazing and tormenting the poor fiend on every occasion. He ceased to be in fashion at the end of the sixteenth century.

VII. The fool in the old dumb shows exhibited at fairs and perhaps at inns, in which he was generally engaged in a struggle with Death…It is possible that some casual vestiges’ of this species of entertainment might have suggested the modern English pantomimes.

VIII. The fool in the Whitsun ales and Morris dance.

IX. The mountebank’s fool, or merry Andrew. 

were you to take the cosmo “what fool are you quiz” where would you land? as for me, i could see myself pretty easily as a class ii, subtype 1 fool. 

___

source: “a dissertation on the clowns and fools of shakespeare,” in illustrations of shakespeare, and of ancient manners, by francis douce (1807).

I really like this guys Tunmblr.

(Source: ragbag)

EssayTyper

Essay Typer Screen

world-shaker:

This is creepy.

Ninja Update: Apparently people don’t read the tags, or the About page. This pulls text from Wikipedia. It’s clearly cheating, and I don’t endorse plagiarism. If you cheat, you don’t just deserve an F. You deserve a special mark that will always appear on your transcript letting people know you cheated.

Okay… Now I want a unicorn!

1 year ago - 55
visual-poetry:

“reblog this” by mobstr
(via libneni)i

i AM SO EASILY INFLUENCED SOMETIMES…

visual-poetry:

“reblog this” by mobstr

(via libneni)i

i AM SO EASILY INFLUENCED SOMETIMES…